Nanotools for Neuroscience and Brain Activity Mapping

Neuroscience is at a crossroads. Great effort is being invested into deciphering specific neural interactions and circuits. At the same time, there exist few general theories or principles that explain brain function. We attribute this disparity, in part, to limitations in current methodologies. Traditional neurophysiological approaches record the activities of one neuron or a few neurons at a time. Neurochemical approaches focus on single neurotransmitters. Yet, there is an increasing realization that neural circuits operate at emergent levels, where the interactions between hundreds or thousands of neurons, utilizing multiple chemical transmitters, generate functional states. Brains function at the nanoscale, so tools to study brains must ultimately operate at this scale, as well. Nanoscience and nanotechnology are poised to provide a rich toolkit of novel methods to explore brain function by enabling simultaneous measurement and manipulation of activity of thousands or even millions of neurons. We and others refer to this goal as the Brain Activity Mapping Project. In this Nano Focus, we discuss how recent developments in nanoscale analysis tools and in the design and synthesis of nanomaterials have generated optical, electrical, and chemical methods that can readily be adapted for use in neuroscience. These approaches represent exciting areas of technical development and research. Moreover, unique opportunities exist for nanoscientists, nanotechnologists, and other physical scientists and engineers to contribute to tackling the challenging problems involved in understanding the fundamentals of brain function

Immunodetection and clinico-pathological correlates of two tumour growth regulators in laryngeal carcinoma

Activation of telomerase, present in the vast majority of all human cancers, is associated with elongation of chromosomal telomeres and consequent cell immortalization. Telomere length homeostasis is a dynamic process governed by the negative feedback mechanism of the telomeric repeat binding factor 1 (TRF1) which inhibits the action of telomerase in telomerase-positive cells. In an attempt to investigate markers of tumour growth as possible prognostic indicators in laryngeal cancer, we studied the expression of TRF1 and of the proliferation marker Ki67 on 96 invasive squamous carcinomas of the larynx. A standard three step immunoperoxidase staining method was applied on paraffin sections incubated with appropriate polyclonal antibodies. The percentages of Ki67- and TRF1-immunopositive cancerous cells were calculated by image analysis. Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis of the staining results were performed in order to detect any association of the examined immunomarkers with the tumours’ classical clinicopathological variables including nuclear morphometric features as well as with patients’ diseasefree survival. Ki67 immunostaining was positively linked with advanced patients’ age, nodal involvement as well as presence of early recurrence. No relation was found between proliferative fraction and TRF1 immunoexpression. TRF1 was expressed in 55.2% of all cases and was positively linked only to tumour size. Multivariate statistical analysis revealed the presence of lymph nodal metastasis and Ki67 immunopositivity index ³ 20% as significant predictors of relapse. Increased Ki67 immunostaining appears to be a promising marker of tumour aggressiveness in laryngeal c a n c e r. After one point at the tumour’s natural history, the maintenance of tumour growth does not seem to depend on cell proliferation but on TRF1 immunoexpression. Whether the latter can be used for the identification of immortalized cells in every-day practice is worth investigating